1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The defendant's successor 72,716,863 won and its 30,904,49 won among the plaintiff's successor intervenors.

While a lawsuit seeking determination on the plaintiff's claim is pending before the court, a third party succeeded to all or part of the right that is the object of lawsuit.

In a case where a plaintiff participates in a lawsuit pursuant to Article 81 of the Civil Procedure Act, if the plaintiff does not dispute the succession of the successor, but does not withdraw from the lawsuit or withdraw the lawsuit, or if the plaintiff remains in the lawsuit because he did not obtain the defendant's consent (in the case of withdrawal from the lawsuit, it is not recognized as consent), Article 67 of the Civil Procedure Act concerning indispensable co-litigation shall apply to the claims filed by the plaintiff and the successor, so the court shall make a decision on both the plaintiff's claim and the plaintiff's successor's claim (see Supreme Court Decision 2012Da46170, Oct. 23, 2019, etc.). While the lawsuit of this case is pending, the plaintiff transferred the gold claim of this case to the plaintiff successor to the plaintiff, and thus, the plaintiff's claim against the defendant against the defendant is no longer reasonable.

2. Determination as to the plaintiff's successor's claim

(a) Indication of claims: It is as shown in the reasons for the claim in the annex (Provided, That "creditor" shall be "Plaintiff" and "debtor" shall be "Defendant", respectively). (b) Judgment by service by publication (Article 208 (3) 3 of the Civil Procedure Act)