logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 인천지방법원 2016.07.14 2016나2086
임금등
Text

1. The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Defendant.

Purport of claim and appeal

purport.

Reasons

1. As to the cause of claim

A. 1) The Plaintiff (Appointed Party) provided labor by being employed by each Defendant from May 1, 2013 to October 7, 2014, and from May 7, 2013 to October 7, 2014. 2) The unpaid wages of the Plaintiff (Appointed Party) are KRW 6,314,680, and the unpaid wages of the Selection Party C are KRW 7,687,380.

[Ground of recognition] The entry of Gap evidence No. 1 and the purport of the whole argument

B. The Defendant is obligated to pay to the Plaintiff (Appointed) 6,314,680 won, 7,687,380 won to the Appointed C, and damages for delay at the rate of 20% per annum from October 22, 2014 to the date of full payment, which is the 14th day following the date of retirement.

2. As to the defendant's argument

A. 1) The Plaintiff (Appointed Party) and the Appointed C (hereinafter “Plaintiffs”) have obstructed the Defendant’s payment of the construction price, thereby causing damage to the Plaintiff. 2) There is no evidence to find that the Plaintiffs interfered with the payment of the construction price. Therefore, the above assertion is without merit.

B. Embezzlement 1) Since the selector C embezzleds personnel expenses from the customer, the above personnel expenses should be deducted. 2) there is no evidence to acknowledge that the selector C embezzleds, the above assertion is without merit.

C. Since the Central Alx Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “Central Alx”) that ordered the construction of the Defendant to pay wages directly to the Plaintiffs, the Defendant is not obligated to pay the wages. 2) There is no evidence to support that there was an agreement between the Central Alx, the Plaintiffs, and the Defendant on the direct payment. Therefore, the above assertion is without merit.

3. Thus, the plaintiffs' claims are accepted on the grounds of their reasoning, and the judgment of the court of first instance is just, and the defendant's appeal is dismissed as it is without merit, and it is so decided as per Disposition.

arrow