logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 춘천지방법원 2016.01.14 2015가단52827
손해배상(기)
Text

1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. On December 9, 2008, in the name of the Plaintiff’s former wife B, the ownership transfer registration was completed on December 9, 2008, the 1,417 square meters prior to C and the 556 square meters prior to E, the ownership transfer registration was completed on the same day under the Plaintiff’s former domicile, was incorporated into a local 403-line road construction site according to the Gangwon-do road zone decision notice around June 2006.

B. On February 27, 2009, B obtained permission from the Defendant for a temporary building of 1,417 square meters and 556 square meters prior to Chuncheon-si, the Defendant revoked the above permission, and on May 28, 2009, filed a lawsuit against the Defendant for revocation of the construction permission under the Chuncheon District Court 2009Guhap1042.

C. In the above lawsuit, the above court accepted a temporary building permit with the same content as that of the building permit granted on February 27, 2009 by the defendant, and B withdraws the lawsuit in this case upon the defendant's acceptance of the above temporary building permit. The defendant shall accept the above temporary building if B applies for a business permit necessary for the operation of a store in the above temporary building. The term of use of the above temporary building shall be until September 30, 2012, but if the expropriation procedure for the above temporary building site and adjacent areas is not completed by September 30, 2012, the above temporary building shall be used until its expropriation procedure is completed, and if B withdraws from the above land, it shall be permitted by the defendant until its expropriation procedure is completed (hereinafter referred to as "the conciliation plan in this case"), and the defendant shall receive a new building permit from the defendant as of January 26, 2010 as the conciliation plan in this case to the extent that the new building is to be approved on September 30, 2012 (hereinafter referred to as "the new building permit in this case").

B The ownership is above B.

arrow