Defendant shall be punished by imprisonment without prison labor for eight months.

However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment became final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

The defendant is a person who is engaged in the operation of C Eth Motor Vehicles.

On March 2, 2016, the Defendant driven the above car on March 14:10, 2016, and continued to drive the above car at the speed of about 40 km from the long-distance intersection in front of the post office in front of the forest located in the city of the city of the city of the city of the city of the city to the long-distance intersection, and received the part of the victim D (72 years old) driving the bicycle left side of the bicycle of the victim D (72 years old) who was standing the crosswalk due to an occupational negligence in violation of the signal, was on the right side of the front driver of the said car.

Defendant 1 suffered injury to the victim, such as spine (L4) in spine (L4) in need of approximately 12 weeks medical treatment due to the foregoing traffic accident.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. A traffic accident report (1) (1) (1)

1. Photographs photographs of black stuffs;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes of a medical certificate;

1. Relevant Article 3 (1) and the proviso to Article 3 (2) of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents Aggravated Punishment, Article 268 of the Criminal Act, and the choice of imprisonment without prison labor, concerning criminal facts;

1. There is no record of criminal punishment exceeding a fine since 1999, and there is no record of criminal punishment since 199, the defendant's age, sex behavior, environment, background leading to the crime, circumstance leading to the crime, etc. shall be comprehensively taken into account in the course of the investigation to the effect that the victim suffered serious injury by shocking the victim due to the negligence committed in violation of the normal signal signal unfavorable to the reason for sentencing under Article 62 (1) (the following favorable circumstances) of the Criminal Act, and that the victim and the victim have avoided the fact of violating the signal signal prior to the presentation of the evidential evidence in the course of investigation.