All appeals are dismissed.

The grounds of appeal are examined.

1. Examining the evidence duly admitted and examined by the lower court and the first instance court as to Defendant A’s grounds of appeal, the lower court’s collection of KRW 238,400,000 from Defendant A for the reasons indicated in its reasoning is justifiable.

The lower court did not err by misapprehending the legal doctrine regarding collection or by exceeding the bounds of the principle of free evaluation of evidence against logical and empirical rules.

2. According to the records on Defendant G’s appeal, Defendant G did not submit an appellate brief within the statutory period. Defendant G did not state the grounds for appeal in the petition of appeal.

3. Examining the evidence duly adopted and examined by the lower court and the first instance court as to Defendant H’s grounds of appeal, the lower court’s judgment that convicted Defendant H of the instant facts charged on the grounds stated in its reasoning is justifiable.

There is no violation of law such as exceeding the bounds of the principle of free evaluation of evidence in violation of logical and empirical rules, or misunderstanding of legal principles concerning name lending and job assistant in violation of the Certified Public Labor Attorney Act.

4. Examining the evidence duly adopted and examined by the lower court and the first instance court on Defendant I’s grounds of appeal, the lower court’s judgment that convicted Defendant I of the facts charged in this case on the grounds stated in its reasoning is justifiable.

There is no error of exceeding the bounds of the principle of free evaluation of evidence in violation of logical and empirical rules, or of misapprehending the relevant legal principles.

5. Therefore, all appeals are dismissed. It is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all participating Justices on the bench.