The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The decision of the court below on the summary of the grounds for appeal (a prison term of six months, an additional collection of 1320,000 won) is too unreasonable.

2. In a case where there is no change in the conditions of sentencing compared with the first instance court, and the sentencing of the first instance court does not deviate from the reasonable scope of discretion, it is reasonable to respect it.

(see, e.g., Supreme Court en banc Decision 2015Do3260, Jul. 23, 2015). The lower court determined punishment in consideration of the fact that the Defendant had been subject to punishment several times for the same kind of crime and committed the instant crime even during the repeated crime period, and that the instant crime constitutes concurrent crimes under the latter part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and there is no change in circumstances or normal relationship that could change the sentence of the lower court in the trial.

Considering the following factors, comprehensively taking into account the Defendant’s age, character and conduct, motive and background of the crime, records of the crime, and circumstances after the crime, the sentence imposed by the court below is not hot within the reasonable scope of discretion.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the ground that it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.