A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for a period of five months.

However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Criminal facts

피고인은 2017. 9. 2. 22:13 경 양산시 B에 있는 C 호프집 앞 노상에서, ‘ 손님이 술에 취해 행패를 부린다' 는 112 신고를 받고 출동한 양산 경찰서 D 지구대 소속 경찰관인 경사 E로부터 ’ 술에 많이 취하셨으니 댁으로 귀가하시라‘ 는 말을 듣자 격분하여 위 E에게 ’ 야 이 개새끼야, 내가 잘못한 거 있나

In addition, the police officer interfered with the legitimate execution of duties concerning the handling of the 112 Report by assaulting the E, knee, knee, etc., by using the lue se se fe fe fe fe fe fe fe .

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by the police for E;

1. A written statement;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to a investigation report (to attach patrol boxes and video CDs in the field);

1. Relevant Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act, the choice of punishment for the crime, and the choice of imprisonment;

1. Reasons for sentencing under Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act [Type Decision] Obstructing the performance of official duties in accordance with Article 62(1) of the Act on the Suspension of Execution / [Determination on the Place of Recommendation] Basic Field / [Scope of Recommendation] 6 months to 1 year and 6 months / (whether suspended of execution is suspended of execution or not] Major Reasons: In the case of a negative previous conviction (decision on a suspended sentence of not more than 5 years): The details and degree of the obstruction of the performance of official duties / The defendant's obstruction of the performance of official duties in 2013, obstruction of the execution of official duties in 2013, obstruction of the defendant'