Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 6,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Punishment of the crime

On September 29, 2008, the Defendant was issued a summary order of KRW 1 million for a crime of violating the Road Traffic Act (drinking driving) at the Changwon District Court on September 29, 2008, and a summary order of KRW 1.5 million for the same crime from Msan support at the same court on December 29, 2014.

On October 27, 2015, the Defendant driven CK5 vehicle under the influence of alcohol content of about 50 meters from around 00:10 to around 0.09% of alcohol content among blood, from around 50 meters before the day of the frequency at which it is impossible to find out the trade name near the Gyeongdong-dong, Chungcheongnam-si, Kimhae-si. to the day before the church, the Defendant driven CK5 vehicle.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Reporting on the self-finding of any person who is under influence of traffic on the road, reporting on the situation of the driver under influence of alcohol, and inquiring about the results of regulating the driving of alcohol;

1. Previous convictions in judgment: Application of a reply to inquiry, such as criminal history, (A) and Acts and subordinate statutes to report an investigation (Attachment of summary order to the same type of power);

1. Article 148-2 (1) 1 and Article 44-2 (1) of the Road Traffic Act concerning facts constituting an offense;

1. Selection of an alternative fine for punishment;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. The reasons for sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act are the reasons for sentencing unfavorable to the Defendant, even though the Defendant had been sentenced to a fine due to a violation of traffic laws (driving of alcohol) as stated in the facts constituting the crime in the judgment, again commits the same kind of crime. The fact that the amount of alcohol concentration during the blood alcohol at the time of driving of the instant drinking is relatively high, etc.

However, in light of the fact that the Defendant disposes of the instant vehicle, and is going to commute to and from work by using a company bus, etc., the driving distance at the time of driving the instant drinking is relatively short, the Defendant did not cause a traffic accident, the Defendant was sentenced to imprisonment without prison labor or heavier punishment, and the Defendant’s retirement from the company in which the Defendant is working, and supports the mother of the old, the Defendant’s age, sex behavior, motive for committing the crime, and motive.