Defendant

A Imprisonment with prison labor for two years and for one year and six months, respectively.

except that from the date of this judgment.

Punishment of the crime

Defendant

On December 9, 2008, A was sentenced to imprisonment with prison labor for one year and six months and three years of suspended execution in the Busan District Court on December 9, 2008, and the judgment became final and conclusive on August 25, 201.

1. The Defendants’ violation of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Economic Crimes (Misappropriation) is the president of the I Federation (hereinafter “Federation”) and the operating chairperson of the I Federation (hereinafter “Mutual Aid Association”), who exercises overall control over matters concerning the business, budget execution, property management, etc. of the Federation and the Mutual Aid Association, including deliberation and resolution on the approval of the budget and settlement of accounts of the Financial Cooperative and the budget execution.

Defendant

B As the president of the Ulsan Metropolitan City J Association (hereinafter referred to as the “Ulsan Association”), the operating committee of the mutual aid association, and the advisory chairperson of the Ulsan Metropolitan City Department (hereinafter referred to as the “Ulsan District Department”), the Ulsan Metropolitan City Council is a person who has deliberated and decided on matters concerning approval of the budget and settlement of accounts of the Association, and matters concerning the operation of the Ulsan Metropolitan City Department, and has deliberated and consulted on matters concerning the operation of the Ulsan Metropolitan Government Department.

Defendant

B around April 2007, in the case of the president of the Federation in the 15th floor of the Seocho-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government K building, and the mutual infinite golf clubs in Busan, etc., the facts charged are indicated as the place of public contest. However, according to the evidence duly adopted and investigated by this court, it appears that Defendant A’s house in the above L, who met the Defendants, M, etc., but did not talk about the auction at the time. Thus, the Defendant B’s prosecutor’s statement (the investigation record No. 728) changed the place of public contest.

Defendant

A has paid a large amount of damages by losing a lawsuit against the Ulsan Metropolitan City and Ulsan-gun.

At present, the shares of the Ulsan Association among the buildings and sites of the Ulsan Association (hereinafter referred to as "Ulsan Association") are 20% of the shares of the Ulsan Association.