1.(a)

The Defendants jointly and severally against the Plaintiffs KRW 10,000,000,

B. Defendant C and Defendant E shall be jointly and severally the Plaintiff.

1. Basic facts

A. Defendant E, who is the representative director of Plaintiff A and Defendant C, and Defendant D, concurrently held office as the representative director of the Plaintiff A and Defendant D corporation, was to promote energy-saving projects (i.e., “ESCO” projects, and (ii) to install and reduce energy-saving facilities, such as LED lighting, and to recover the investment cost).

Accordingly, the plaintiff B lent 10 million won project funds in the future of the defendant D, and delivered the corporation card to the defendant E to use it as business expenses.

B. On January 15, 2013, Plaintiff A and Defendant C entered into a business agreement for entry into energy-saving projects (hereinafter “instant agreement”) with a view to providing the following details.

Plaintiff

A shall provide Defendant C with an office for three months from January 15, 2013, and subsidize an aggregate of 6,500,000 won, such as monthly income of the office, wages of employees, operating expenses, etc.

The defendant C awarded a contract for the construction of energy-saving products at least 1 per month (at least 30 million won in contract amount) through business activities, and the plaintiff A shall implement construction works according to the contract for the construction, and the business profit shall be contrary to the business profit.

Defendant C and Defendant E shall jointly and severally return to the Plaintiffs the total amount of KRW 10,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,00

C. Accordingly, Plaintiff B leased an officetel’s KRW 10,00,000,000, monthly rent of KRW 1300,000,000 (in the case of brokerage commission, KRW 4.50,000) to the Plaintiff’s company-affiliated research institute and Defendant C’s office. Plaintiff A paid KRW 6.9 million as the employee’s salary (E KRW 3 million, F2.6 million, and G 1.3 million).

On the other hand, the amount used by Defendant E until the contract is terminated is 1,439.