logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
Text
Reasons
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울남부지방법원 2017.08.25 2016고단6324
강제추행
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of three million won.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

Reasons

Criminal facts

The defendant is a person who is in office as the head of the D security management team, and the victim E (n, 25 years of age) is an employee of F corporation of the Aviation Security Enterprise Co., Ltd., the subordinate company of D.

1. Around July 2015, the Defendant committed an indecent act by force against the victim by flaging the victim’s hand floor in the D building located in Gangseo-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government by putting the victim’s hand in the part of the victim’s hand and the end of his hand.

2. From October 2016 to November 16, 2016, the Defendant committed an indecent act by force against the victim by taking the victim’s chest below his/her chest in the instant D building LV from around 14:00 to around 16:00.

3. From October 2016 to November 16, 2016, the Defendant: (a) committed an indecent act by force against the victim by making the victim’s elel of the pertinent D building one time with his / her her her her mare around 16:00 to around 16:00; and (b) committing an indecent act by force.

4. At around 09:50 on December 1, 2016, the Defendant: (a) laid the victim into a resting room; (b) laid the victim into a resting room; and (c) laid down the victim’s hand with the Defendant’s hand; (d) laid down the victim’s hand with the Defendant’s hand; and (c) continued to “Drun the victim’s hand floor with the Defendant’s hand.”

“In doing so, as the Defendant’s fault was in charge of the victim’s right bucks, the victim was forced to commit an indecent act by inserting the victim’s hand with bucks between the victim’s bucks.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes on police statements made to E and H;

1. Relevant Article 298 of the Criminal Act and the choice of fines for criminal facts;

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. Article 16 (2) of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Punishment, etc. of Sexual Crimes Committed to Order;

1. The reason for sentencing of Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act (the sentencing criteria are not applicable since they were selected to impose a fine) is the status of controlling and supervising the subordinate companies.

arrow