The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. On May 27, 2014, the lower court acquitted the Defendant on the charge of violating the Act on Promotion of the Use of Information and Communications Network Utilization and Information Protection, Etc. (Defamation) around May 27, 2014 among the facts charged in the instant case, and convicted the remainder of the facts charged.

However, since only the defendant appealed against the guilty portion of the judgment of the court below, and the acquittal portion of the judgment of the court below is separate and finalized as the prosecutor did not appeal, the scope of the judgment of this court is limited to

2. Summary of grounds for appeal;

A. misunderstanding of facts or misapprehension of legal principles (1) The Defendant sent text messages to the victim as stated in this part of the facts charged, but the victim knew the victim's inappropriate behavior and demanded suspension of such behavior, and the victim sent a letter to the purport that the victim slandered the Defendant and deleted it, and did not intend to cause fears or apprehensions, and the victim was also feel fears.

It is difficult to see it.

(2) As to the violation of the Act on Promotion of Information and Communications Network Utilization and Information Protection, Etc. (Defamation), the Defendant did not publish, on each relevant date and time of the facts charged, the content identical to the facts charged on the bulletin board of C University Incheon Dong-dong, Incheon.

Even if the Defendant posted such a letter,

Even if the defendant has an inappropriate relationship with the victim,

The reason was that there was considerable reason to believe that the victim, who is the chairperson of the same literature, was in an inappropriate relationship with the next fluorial fluorial fluorial fluorial fluorial fluorial fluorial fluorial fluor, was a representative of the same literature

B. The lower court’s sentence against an unfair defendant in sentencing (an amount of KRW 3 million) is too large.