Text
A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for two years.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
1. Violation of the Subsidy Management Act and fraud Defendant shall be the Ministry of Agriculture and Forestry with respect to the former Ministry for Agriculture and Forestry Food and Fishery Products under the control of the victim’s territory from January 13, 201 to April 7, 2015 (hereinafter “Ministry”).
E Business Bureau selected as a subsidized business operator of a public contest project (hereinafter referred to as the "Business Bureau")
At the same time, the Korea Agricultural Company F Co., Ltd. (the majority of shareholders and Young-jin Co., Ltd. are the Defendant-friendly relatives, and the company was changed to G Co., Ltd. as of June 5, 2014.
hereinafter referred to as "profit-making corporation"
A person who is in charge of the above business has been in charge of the representative director and is in charge of this business.
On the other hand, the Ministry of Agriculture and Forestry will designate a profit-making corporation as a corporation for the self-reliance of the business group, which the defendant submitted through the Chungcheong City.
As a result of reviewing the implementation plan for the above project 2012 project with the purport of “the above project,” it recognizes the problem that Defendant’s assets acquired with a subsidy may become private by profit-making corporations in light of the operation method of the above project. From May to June 6, 2012, the Defendant, through on-site inspections, workshops meetings, etc., sought a way to promote the business by directly receiving subsidies from the Defendant and directly establishing a profit-making corporation, even if an incorporated association separately establishes a profit-making corporation to be in charge of producing and selling real products, by investing real estate acquired with a subsidy in kind, etc. to make it a subsidiary by securing more than half of the shares of the profit-making corporation’s profit-making corporation’s operating right.
2. A supplementary instruction was given to that effect.
However, around June 12, 2012, the defendant continued to operate a subsidized project without establishing an incorporated association.
“The purpose of “ H.” is H. 2012.