1. The Defendant’s KRW 10,608,978,863 and its weight to the Plaintiff:

A. From October 29, 2010 to December 30, 2010, 66,550,000 won

1. Basic facts

A. 1) Prior to the establishment of the Plaintiff, the existing association established for the purpose of newly constructing the housing in the 770 Won in the Sinpo-ri, Sinpo-ri, Sinpo-si, Gwangju (the name was the same as the Plaintiff; hereinafter referred to as the “existing association”) was approved on July 19, 200, by obtaining the authorization for establishment of a single-use association on September 19, 2003, and the Defendant, the Sinpo-ri Corporation, the business service company, the Defendant, the Defendant, and the original flus Co., Ltd. (the corporation established for the purpose of housing construction-related service business, and its trade name was the final change.

hereinafter referred to as “HAC Construction.”

B) As between the two, the construction cost was KRW 33,412,50,00 (excluding KRW 2,500,000 per square year, value added tax) and the construction period was determined as 24 months after the alteration of form and quality (the site creation work) and entered into a joint agreement with the purport of newly constructing the 15th floor above the ground, 336 apartment units below the 2nd floor below the ground, 336 apartment units below the 2nd floor below the ground, and auxiliary welfare facilities. 2) After which the existing association, after reviewing the pollutant load, etc. (the project area is located in the water supply source) to promote the alteration into the collective housing association from the initial detached housing association (the procedure necessary for the project area is located in the water supply source), the district unit plan was announced on November 26, 2007, and the alteration was authorized to the collective housing association on December 24, 2007.

B. Around April 27, 2008, the dissolution of an existing association, the establishment of the Plaintiff, and the existing association succeeding to the rights and obligations of the existing association by the Plaintiff, by holding a general meeting of dissolution and passed a resolution to dissolve by 237 members of the total number of 331 members. On the same day, the Plaintiff held an inaugural general meeting on the same day and held 120 members of the existing association, who are expected to become a Plaintiff’s partner, and newly established and elected the rules of the association. The existing association succeeded to all kinds of duties, rights, and obligations promoted by the existing association until the time, and participated in the Plaintiff’