1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Purport of claim and appeal

The first instance court.

1. The court's explanation of this case is the same as the grounds for the judgment of the court of first instance, and thus, citing this as it is in accordance with the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

(1) The plaintiff asserted that the fire of this case occurred in the area exclusively controlled by the manufacturer because the part of the power source code, which was discovered with the electrical characteristics, is close to the main body part of the power source code, and is not used by the consumer by hand, based on the result of the fact-finding conducted by the National Science Investigation Agency of this Court. The plaintiff argued that the fire of this case occurred in the area exclusively controlled by the manufacturer. However, according to the above fact-finding result, the fire of this case is not infinite formation point because the direct length between the power source code and the original product code presented as appraisal can not be compared." However, the part adjacent to the fins still remains a clothes, and the parts adjacent to the main body are formed with a gins and a ginssssing, and therefore, it is hard to see that the fire of this case occurred in the area exclusively controlled by the defendant of this case. Thus, the plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.