logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울동부지방법원 2020.07.23 2019고정1306
폭행
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 300,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The defendant and B are married couple in November 2013, and C(27 years of age) is a couple who has been married with the former wife in November 2013, and C(here 27 years of age) has resided in the dwelling of the defendant and B, and there has been a dispute between the defendant and the above C, and the present is preparing for divorce.

On July 22, 2019, at around 20:26, the Defendant: (a) committed assault against the victim B (age 56) who was the spouse, and during the dispute with the Defendant, on the grounds that the Defendant was granted C’s animals out of the above residence, and that the Defendant committed assault against the victim’s shoulder her visit by pushing the victim with her clothes her clothes her body.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. B Legal statement;

1. On-site photographs, the accused and the defense counsel did not assault the victim, and even if the shoulder of the victim was faced with the visit.

Even if the defendant and the victim did not mean that they are tightly, tightly, and string, it is argued that there was no intention to face the victim's shoulder with the visit.

However, according to the evidence duly adopted and examined by this court, the victim stated at the investigative agency that the victim was faced with the shoulder in the door pole that the victim was fluored by the defendant's walked. The defendant was faced with the door pole that the victim was fluored by the defendant's fluor, like in this court, just like in this court, it is consistent with the statement. The circumstance of the occurrence of the case in which the victim stated at the investigative agency is relatively detailed and specific. According to the on-site photograph, there are things that seem to be owned by the victim's wife on the inner bed, and according to the on-site photograph, it seems that there was a dispute and body fighting between the defendant and the victim.

arrow