The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. Summary of grounds for appeal;

A. At the time of each of the instant crimes, the Defendant was in a state of mental and physical weakness or loss of mental and physical health due to polar disorder, depression, etc.

B. The punishment sentenced by the lower court (two years of imprisonment) is excessively unreasonable.

2. Determination

A. In light of the developments leading up to each of the instant crimes, the means and methods of committing each of the instant crimes, which may be recognized by mental and physical disorder, etc., the Defendant cannot be deemed to have had the ability or ability to make a decision to discern things due to the polar disorder, depression, etc. at the time of committing each of the instant crimes.

Therefore, the defendant's mental disorder is without merit.

B. Although there are favorable circumstances such as the confession and reflect of the illegal defendant, the defendant's confession and reflect of the sentencing, and the fact that the defendant is suffering from illness due to a stimulative disorder, depression, etc., the crime is not good in light of the official duties of this case, injury, and the method, frequency, timing, etc. of each crime, and the responsibility for the crime of this case is also very significant. The defendant committed each crime of this case even in the past, even though he had been punished several times due to the same similar crimes in the past, and the defendant did not reach an agreement with the victimized police officer or victim up to the trial, and the court below was sentenced to the judgment of the court below by taking full account of the favorable circumstances of the defendant, and there was no special reason to change the sentencing after the decision of the court below, and the scope of the recommended sentence according to the sentencing guidelines of the Supreme Court sentencing committee (one year to seven years and four months) and other conditions of punishment, such as the defendant's age, sex, environment, motive, means, result, etc. after the crime and circumstances after the crime, it cannot be deemed unfair.

Therefore, the defendant's improper assertion of sentencing is without merit.

3. If so, the defendant's appeal is justified.