beta
Text
The defendant's appeal is dismissed.
Reasons
1. The decision of the court below (one hundred months of imprisonment and the cost of the lawsuit) is too unreasonable as to the summary of the grounds for appeal.
2. The Defendant recognized all of the instant crimes.
In addition, the victim of the crime caused by assault in this case is the defendant's wife, and the above victim does not want the punishment of the defendant.
However, as the court below properly pointed out the reasons for the sentencing, the defendant was sentenced to imprisonment on September 13, 2013 with prison labor for one year and two months, three years of suspended execution, three years of protection observation on September 13, 2013, and the defendant suffered from a repeated crime after being sentenced to imprisonment with prison labor for the victim on January 18, 2014, where he/she gets the victim to avoid the victim's inside and outside of the victim's body on the following floor and got the victim to get him/her out of the body of the victim's body, and got him/her out of the barbbbbbbbb, and got him/her out of the escape of the victim's body, and got him/her out of the escape of the victim's body, he/she again suffered from a repeated crime after being sentenced to imprisonment with prison labor on April 28, 2014.
In addition, the defendant is highly likely to repeat a crime against the same victim, such as assaulting the victim who has no right to institute a prosecution or having received family protective disposition more than ten times, and even in light of the background, method and degree of assault, the defendant's act of exercising violence against the victim is no longer considered as a matter within the family and thus, it cannot be left autonomously.
In addition, on November 5, 2013, the defendant has a record of assaulting or threatening police officers on November 5, 2013, and assaulting police officers by the police station in the second police station as well as being punished by other violence.
In full view of the above circumstances, the prosecutor shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for the defendant.