Text
1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.
2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.
Purport of claim and appeal
The first instance court.
Reasons
1. The reasons for the court's explanation concerning this case are as follows: "property tax" shall be added to "registration tax, registration tax, and property tax" following the second part of the judgment of the court of first instance, "the imposition of the second part of the second part of the judgment of the court of first instance" shall be adjusted to "the imposition of the above acquisition tax, registration tax, and property tax", "the acquisition tax, registration tax, and property tax" shall be adjusted to "the acquisition tax, registration tax, and property tax", "the second part of the judgment of the court of first instance" shall be added to "the second part of the judgment of the court of first instance (including the provisional number)," "the second part of the judgment of the court of second part (excluding the part seized by the disposition of this case)", and the second part to "the fourth part of the judgment of the court of first instance" shall be added to "the first to "the first part of the judgment of the court of first instance" and the second part to 7 shall be cited in accordance with Article 8 (2) of the Administrative Litigation Act and the main part
2. The Plaintiff acquired the instant land under his own name as stated above, and the head of Dongdaemun-gu imposed the acquisition tax, registration tax, property tax, and property tax under the Plaintiff’s name, and the said acquisition tax, registration tax, and property tax were paid to the Plaintiff. The Plaintiff filed a lawsuit against the head of Dongdaemun-gu Office seeking cancellation of the acquisition tax and registration tax, and accordingly, decided to refund the said acquisition tax, registration tax, and property tax to the Plaintiff. As such, the said acquisition tax, registration tax, and property tax belong to the Plaintiff (as alleged by the Plaintiff, even if the instant land was entrusted with the property owned by the pathn Association, which is an organization of Dongdaemun-gu, or the acquisition tax, registration tax, and property tax were collected at the pathn Council, such circumstance does not change the reversion of the instant refund claim, and the Plaintiff transferred the remaining refund claim except for the portion seized by the instant disposition to the path Association to the path Council). Therefore