1. The Defendant (Counterclaim Plaintiff) paid KRW 29,530,000 to the Plaintiff (Counterclaim Defendant) and the amount from December 31, 2014 to June 2, 2015.

The fact that the judgment on the cause of the main claim is recognized is that the Plaintiff runs the business of processing parts under the trade name of “C,” and the Defendant runs the business of manufacturing agricultural machinery under the trade name of “D.”

The Plaintiff processed and supplied the parts equivalent to a total of KRW 142,230,000 to the Defendant from January 30, 2014 to December 30, 2014, and did not receive the processing cost of KRW 29,530,00.

[Ground for recognition] In light of the facts without dispute, Gap evidence Nos. 1, 2, and 3 (including branch numbers if there are several numbers), and the purport of the whole pleadings, the defendant is obligated to pay to the plaintiff the processed amount of KRW 29,530,00 which is not paid to the plaintiff and the damages for delay calculated at each rate of 15% per annum from the next day of the delivery date to the next day of the final delivery date of the complaint, until June 2, 2015, as prescribed by the Act on Special Cases concerning the Promotion, etc. of Legal Proceedings, etc., from the next day to September 30, 2015, and from the next day to the day of full payment, unless there are special circumstances.

[소송촉진 등에 관한 특례법 제3조 제1항 본문의 법정이율에 관한 규정(2015. 9. 25. 대통령령 제26553호로 개정된 것)에 의하면, 소송촉진 등에 관한 특례법 제3조 제1항 본문의 법정이율은 2015. 9. 30.까지는 연 20%, 2015. 10. 1.부터는 연 15%이므로, 위 인정 부분을 초과하는 지연손해금 청구 부분은 받아들이지 아니한다]. 피고의 주장 및 반소 청구에 관한 판단 피고의 주장 원고가 가공한 부품 중 펠렛 성형기의 몸통에 해당하는 힌지3축과 롤러의 내경이 도면과 달리 헐겁게 가공되었고, 그로 인해 피고가 주식회사 무염(이하 ‘무염’이라고만 한다)에 납품한 기계의 롤러 내 베어링이 헛돌면서 진동이 발생하고, 결국 기계의 축과 다이(금형)에 균열이 생겼다.

Accordingly, the defendant spent 27,500,000 won in order to re-intake rollers into salt, and produced salt.