beta
Text
1. The defendant's appeal is dismissed.
2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Defendant.
Purport of claim and appeal
1..
Reasons
1. The reasoning for the court’s explanation of this case is as follows, and all of the judgment of the court of first instance is the same as the reasoning for the judgment of the court of first instance, and thus, it is acceptable in accordance with the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.
[Attachment] Part 2] Part 7 of the 2nd page "to request" shall be "to request."
Part 3, "A 1, 2, and 3-2 of evidence A 3-2" in Part 12 shall be read as "each entry of evidence A 1 through 3 (including paper numbers) and some testimony of witness B of the trial court."
No. 3, 19, 16, 16, 16, 16, 16, 16, 2) The Director General of the Construction Site at the Construction Site is generally in charge of the work related to the execution of the construction work at a specified construction site. Thus, it is reasonable to deem that a construction site manager as an employee entrusted with a specific type of business or a specific matter under Article 15 of the Commercial Act has a partial comprehensive authority for the relevant work. The scope of the ordinary work of the Director of the Construction Site is all acts related to the conclusion of a subcontract related to the execution of the construction site, the payment of the construction cost, the payment of rent, etc.
(See Supreme Court Decision 94Da2084 delivered on September 30, 1994, etc.). In light of the above legal principles, the health team, B was the head of the Defendant’s site at the time of the construction in Daegu C, B prepared and executed the instant contract prior to the commencement of the construction in question to the Plaintiff. After the completion of the construction in question, B prepared and executed the instant detailed statement. As the important contents of the instant contract, B stated “7,000 won per square meter,” which is the unit price for the construction in question, as part of the parties to the contract, and the “New Tri-Sa case E, and New Tri-Sa case B,” which is the party to the contract, as part of the witness B’s testimony.