The sentence of sentence against the defendant shall be suspended.

Punishment of the crime

Around July 27, 2011, the Defendant stated that, at the time of the flood, the victim D’s home located in Seocho-gu Seoul Seocho-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government stated that, “The Defendant would pay money to the victim without a molding it until July 27, 201, while putting rainwater into the house and putting it together, due to the flood at that time, the Defendant borrowed KRW 1.7 million to the victim.”

However, even if the victim borrows money from the victim, there was no intention or ability to repay the money on the agreed date.

Nevertheless, the above false statement was received from the victim who believed it on the same day to the new bank passbook in the name of E designated by the defendant on the Internet from the wording store operated by the victim on the same day, and acquired the amount equivalent to the same amount.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Legal statement of witness D;

1. Partial entry of the police interrogation protocol of the accused;

1. Statement made to D by the police;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes governing the submission order;

1. Relevant provisions of the Criminal Act and Article 347 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the choice of punishment;

1. Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act (one day: 50,000 won) of the Criminal Act;

1. Article 59 (1) of the Criminal Act (the postponement of sentence: Fine not exceeding 500,000 won; fine not exceeding 500,000 won; the defendant has no specific penalty power; the amount of damage has been repaid in full; and all other circumstances, such as character, conduct and family environment