Defendant

A shall be punished by imprisonment for six months, by imprisonment for one year and two months, and by imprisonment for four months, respectively.

(b).

Punishment of the crime

1. The Defendants’ joint crimes committed by the Defendants: (a) requested Defendant A and C to take charge of funds for the packaging package franchise business; (b) Defendant A and C accepted the request; and (c) the Defendants were willing to attract funds under the pretext of operating the wholesale market with the name of “F”.

Defendant

B around the end of December 2010, at the coffee shop located in Gangnam-gu Seoul, Gangnam-gu, Seoul, Defendant C, A, and the victim G were only the victim “A film supervisor,” and obtained a package franchise business license from the victims of defoliants, and obtained a package package franchise business license.

If the Gu Office regulates, the victims of defoliants will solve all the problems.

No. 3 and 4 calendar calendars, the packaging horse was used in the exit area of H.

In consultation with the 25 Gu office, a self-board shall be a short-standing motor vehicle.

If interested, A, a person in charge of funds, was working for all of them, which called "A and a story".

After that, on January 20, 201, Defendant A and C would pay the interest on the second part of the month to the victim G in the coffee shop located in Seocho-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government, where Defendant A and C would lend KRW 50,000 to the victim G with the right to the package horse business held by the victims of high leaves, and pay the principal until April 30, 201.

“.......”

However, around that time, there was no fact that the Defendants owned the packaging horse business license or obtained permission for the operation of the packaging horse store from the competent Gu office, and some of the established packing horse was under circumstances due to the crackdown by the competent Gu office, and there was no intent to use the entire money borrowed from the injured party in the packaging horse franchise business, and there was no intention or ability to pay off the money borrowed from the injured party in time.

As such, the Defendants conspired in collusion with the victim and did not enter the funds in the indictment on January 20, 201 from the victim to the Defendant A’s agricultural bank account, but the following evidence.