Defendants shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

Defendant A of the 2015 Highest 561 Sinsan City F, G land owned by Defendant B, his wife, in order to provide money to be used for personal purposes, using the fact that Defendant B, the wife of which was entitled to receive funds necessary for the purchase of land from the Korea Rural Community Corporation, and used to receive subsidies from the Korea Rural Community Corporation by borrowing his name and again purchasing the land.

Defendant

A around the end of January 2008, at Defendant B’s house located in Y in Y in Y in the end of the end of the day of January, 2008, leased the name of Defendant B, his father of Defendant B (Defendant A’s wife), “A needs money to be individually used, so that he can receive subsidies for full-time farming in the name of F and G land owned by the Korea Rural E Corporation, intending to sell the land. The full-time payment of the purchase amount is made.

The Defendant B proposed to the effect that it was “,” and the Defendant B received the Defendant’s intention from the I and accepted it.

On February 22, 2008, the Defendants entered into a contract to purchase land with the 59,625,000 won of farmland purchase funds from the Korea Agricultural and Fishing Villages Corporation, which was located in 1794 in YY-si, YY-si, YY-si, YY-si, YY-si, in fact, Defendant B did not intend to actually engage in farming and fishing village in the above land; Defendant A borrowed the name of Defendant B; purchased the farmland in the name of Defendant B; and paid subsidies in installments. However, Defendant B, an employee of the Korea Rural Community Corporation, as a person eligible for the fostering of Y-si, Y-si, and was provided by the Korea Rural Community Corporation with the purchase of land by 59,625

As a result, the Defendants conspired to attract the victim to receive the goods.

Defendant B, “2016 Highest 137,” is the owner of F 2,87 square meters and G 3,682 square meters.

A person who owns the issue is not a self-employed person but a direct payment for rice income preservation (hereinafter referred to as "direct payment").