The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. Although considering the fact that the Defendant’s primary criminal defendant’s judgment on the Defendant’s assertion of unfair sentencing is the primary criminal, and the fact that the instant crime is against the Defendant, the number of victims due to each of the instant crimes is large, and in particular, the Defendant’s fraudulent act committed in NN constitutes an e-commerce based on credit and impeding the development of a credit society, which can reduce transaction costs, and thereby reduce transaction costs, the nature of the crime is not particularly good. Furthermore, considering the Defendant’s age, character and behavior, the background and method of the instant crime, the means and method of the instant crime, and the circumstances before and after the instant crime, etc., the lower court’s punishment (ten months of imprisonment) is reasonable and inappropriate.

2. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act since it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.