1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Purport of claim and appeal

The first instance court.

1. Details of the disposition;

A. On February 16, 1993, the Plaintiff obtained the recognition of the injury or disease of “the us at us at us at us at us at us at us at us at us at us at us at us at us at us at us at us at us at us at us at us at us at us at us at us at us at us at us at us at us at us at us at us at us at us at us at us at us at us at us at us at us at us at us at us at us at us at us at sus at us at us at us at us at us

B. On June 20, 2013, the Korea Workers’ Compensation and Welfare Service (hereinafter “Korea Workers’ Compensation and Welfare Service”) submitted a medical treatment plan to the Defendant that “The Plaintiff submitted to the Defendant a medical treatment plan stating that “The Plaintiff shall apply for extension of medical care by applying for medical treatment, such as pharmacologic and physical therapy, for 14 weeks from July 1, 2013 to September 30, 2013, as the symptoms (hereinafter “the symptoms of this case”) such as a serious chronological pain and salt symptoms, decentralization, decentralization, and a disguised disorder, etc. with a strong chronological eropossis.”

C. On June 25, 2013, the Defendant deliberated on the Plaintiff’s symptoms at the advisory council meeting held on March 14, 2013, and decided on whether to terminate the medical treatment until June 30, 2013 in the state of symptoms. As a result of reviewing the medical treatment plan submitted on June 20, 2013, the Defendant issued a non-approval disposition of the medical treatment plan (hereinafter “instant disposition”) on the ground that “The Plaintiff’s symptoms are deemed fixed because the Plaintiff’s symptoms are not worse than at the time of deliberation by the advisory council held on March 14, 2013.”

On July 2, 2013, the National Computerization Hospital issued to the Plaintiff a disability diagnosis statement stating “The possibility of aggravation or recurrence within the short period (the short period of six months): the fixed condition,” and on July 2, 2013, the Plaintiff submitted an application for disability benefits to the Defendant along with a disability diagnosis statement issued by the National Computerization Hospital.

E. On July 9, 2013, the Defendant rendered a judgment under class 1 subparagraph 8 applicable mutatis mutandis to the Plaintiff’s disability grade.