beta
Text
Defendants shall be punished by imprisonment for eight months.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
Defendant
A entered into a “debted Debt Agreement” with the content that (a) joint representative of the F in Yeongdeungpo-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government, (b) joint representative of the F, (c) directors of the F, and (d) the former representative of the H in Gangnam-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government as a pilot of the city of Dong Dong, and (b) Defendant B, who was the representative of the G in Gangnam-gu, Gangnam-gu, Seoul, and (c) the creditors of the claim group, who were the creditors, and (d) the right of the creditors
Defendant
At around 16:00 on May 8, 2009, A and C attended the 8th credit conference held at the 16:00 office of the F Credit Guarantee Office in the above E, and Defendant C provided the Credit Guarantee Board with office and expenses to enable us to receive the rent for commercial buildings and officetels in accordance with the Credit Guarantee Agreement, and attorney fees from the Credit Guarantee Board, and provided the Credit Guarantee Board with the payment of the rent for the commercial buildings and officetels at the credit group so that us is able to work, and provided the Credit Guarantee Board with the payment of the rent for the commercial buildings and officetels at the credit group. Defendant B and C had appointed an attorney at the same place on January 201, 2010 for the purpose of the revocation of the Credit Guarantee Agreement to resolve various claims of creditors by legally cancelling the suit.
However, even if the Defendants received money from the victim, they did not use it as expenses for cancellation litigation, but as employee monthly pay, office operating expenses, etc. unrelated to cancellation litigation, and the Defendants did not appoint an attorney-at-law for cancellation litigation.
On June 4, 2009, the Defendants: (a) by deceiving the victim as such, received 6 million won from the victim to the account under the name of J, which is an employee of the said FF on June 4, 2009; (b) and (c) received a total of 82.5 million won from around that time to April 13, 2010, as shown in the list of crimes in attached Table 23 times.
As a result, the Defendants conspired to induce the victim to take property.