A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

Punishment of the crime

1. On March 25, 2012, the Defendant of the crime against the victim B, who was aware of influence at a mutually influent restaurant located in Mapo-gu Seoul Mapo-gu Seoul Mapo-gu Office, shall be given a full payment of the principal and interest along with the interest on a high amount of money until April 10, 2012, to the victim B, who leased KRW 10 million to run an online game item sales business via the Internet.

The phrase “ makes a false statement.”

However, the defendant did not carry on the above online business, and even if he received money from the injured party, he was planned to use it for the purpose of depositing it into the customer related to the clothing business of the defendant who is not related to the above business.

The Defendant received 5 million won from the injured party on the same day, and 5 million won on March 30, 2012, respectively, and acquired 10 million won in total from the injured party.

2. Crimes against victims C;

A. On October 24, 2012, the fraud Defendant is operating a business of similarity in the field of the victim’s e-mail operated by the victim C in Yongsan-gu, Busan Metropolitan City around October 24, 2012 at the convenience store operated by the victim C.

In order to purchase protoo lottery tickets on credit, the earnings from similar business places are converted in cash so that they can be settled en bloc on every day of demand.

The phrase “ makes a false statement.”

However, in fact, the defendant did not operate business places similar to the above, and even if he purchased protopy on credit from the injured party due to no particular property or work place, he did not have an intention or ability to pay the price.

On October 26, 2012, the Defendant, as well as the Defendant, ordered the injured party to issue protoo lottery tickets equivalent to KRW 200,000,000,000 from around October 26, 2012, had the right to issue protoo lottery tickets equivalent to KRW 26,222,00 on a total amount of 14 occasions from November 8, 2012, and did not pay the amount, thereby acquiring property benefits equivalent to the same amount of money.

B. The Defendant interfered with the exercise of rights above.