The judgment below

Of them, the part on Defendant Y is reversed.

Defendant

Y A person shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

Defendant

S.

1. Summary of grounds for appeal;

A. Of the judgment of the court below, the appeal 1 on the part against Defendant S in relation to the part on appeal against Defendant S is considered as follows: (a) In light of the various circumstances, the sentence of the court below (two years of suspended sentence for imprisonment for eight months) is too unreasonable; and (b) the mistake of facts or misapprehension of legal principles as to the part on acquittal (Fraud) (the prosecutor’s appeal) is erroneous; and (c) the Defendant is Yeongdeungpo-gu Seoul Metropolitan Area N.

2) As to the ground building (AO building, hereinafter referred to as “instant building”)

BB building newly built by A was entrusted under the same water method in the name of the Defendant’s female X, and all of the leases of the building were leased in X name and collected its claims first, and the Defendant was using the title trust title trust law due to the lack of smooth lease when establishing a collateral mortgage on lending money. The Defendant’s unreasonable lease contract and the security money could have been acquired by fraud was effective. According to the title trust agreement entered into between the Defendant and A, the Defendant actively cooperates with A’s lease contract to recover his own funds. According to the title trust agreement entered into between the Defendant and A, the Defendant would give up A’s right to real estate immediately in arrears for 3 months in arrears. In light of the above, the instant building should be entrusted to title trust, and the tenants are deceiving the tenants, and the tenant, who made it impossible for the tenants to smoothly receive the deposit from his claim and interest, and the tenant, who made it difficult for them to receive the deposit by paying the deposit from his own trust deposit, and the amount of the principal joint principal offender, which was the largest economic profits of the Defendant, even if not paid to the beneficiary.

Nevertheless, this part of the charges is charged.