1. All of the plaintiffs' claims are dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit are assessed against the plaintiffs.

1. The following facts are found either as a dispute between the parties or as a whole to the statements set forth in Gap evidence Nos. 1 to 4, and Eul evidence No. 1 (including the pertinent branch numbers), and there is no counter-proof.

On August 8, 2011, the plaintiff A, a pregnant 39th 6th son, was born by a male baby on August 9, 201, when the acquisition of the child was forced to take over at least 20:10.

B. Since the above newborn baby was born for a considerable time after the transfer, it was hospitalized in the patient room for the overall examination. At around 17:30 of the same day, the chest of 50% on the right side side of the chest radiation examination conducted at around 17:30 of the same day was confirmed, and there is no opinion to reduce the chest, as a result of the chest radiation examination conducted at around 22:40 and around 23:46 of the same day, the doctor of the Defendant hospital inserted the chest to the newborn baby at around 00:20 of August 10, 201, and 00:40 of the same day.

C. At around 01:07 on the same day, the Defendant appeared to have plesyed as a result of a chest radiation test, but thereafter, the Defendant died of pulmonary fluent fluor due to plesying, despite the continued medication and cardiopulmonary pulmonary resuscitation, as the heart fluor rate decreased by 152 times and 87%, respectively, and the lusium died of lusium due to plesying due to plesy, around 02:35, notwithstanding the continued medication and cardiopulmonary resuscitation.

(hereinafter referred to as "the deceased baby of this case") D.

Plaintiff

B is the father of the deceased, and the plaintiffs C and D are the brothers and sisters of the deceased.

2. The parties' assertion

A. As the cause of the instant claim, the Plaintiffs: (1) When the Defendant Hospital’s intent inserted a chest to the instant deceased, the pleboo added up the left-hand body, thereby causing damage to the abolished quality and the long-term; and (2) as a result, the instant deceased’s death caused the pulmonary death, the Defendant Hospital, the employer, as the above.