1. The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Defendant.

Purport of claim and appeal

1...

1. The plaintiff asserts that the plaintiff has the obligation to pay the unpaid both parties as the defendant supplied the both parties to the defendant, and even if the defendant is not a party to the transaction, he/she has the obligation to pay the two parties to the transaction.

As to this, the defendant argued that, although the defendant received a report from F to F that it should purchase the adoption from F at the time of investment, it was considered as a temporary transaction and paid the price, it is merely a transaction between the plaintiff and F, and the defendant is not the other party to the transaction, and in particular, from November 2015 after the investment in F was completed, the defendant did not participate in the chip purchase, and there is no fact that it lent the name to F, and therefore, it is not liable for the chip price.

2. The following circumstances, which are acknowledged by the purport of each statement and the entire argument in Gap evidence Nos. 1 through 6, namely, ① the business entity engaging in wholesale and retail business of agricultural products with the trade name of G, and the Plaintiff supplied 18,00,000 net price for 18,00,000 won for adoption frequency of August 27, 2015, to the defendant Kimpo office, and the 1,600 net price for adoption frequency of November 12, 2015 to the same place as KRW 18,90,000, and the 563 net price for adoption frequency of November 21, 2015 to the same place as KRW 5,91,500.

The fact that the defendant has invested in F and operated a partnership business,