The prosecution of this case is dismissed.

The summary of the facts charged of this case is as follows: “The defendant is a person engaged in the construction business at a residential area, and the victim C (ma and 43 years old) is known to the defendant in 2007 as a person who has a share in the above hotel while doing remodeling work for a hotel. The defendant around 11:40 on April 28, 2012, while talking about the existence of the right of retention of the victim and D hotel at the entrance of the late door of the E “D hotel” at the entrance of the entrance of the entrance of the entrance of the entrance of the entrance of the entrance of the victim and D hotel at one time the right-hand knis the left side of the victim.”

This is a crime falling under Article 260 (1) of the Criminal Code and cannot be prosecuted against the victim's express intent under Article 260 (3) of the Criminal Code. Since the victim C expressed his/her intent to withdraw his/her punishment after the prosecution of this case, the prosecution of this case is dismissed in accordance with Article 327 of the Criminal Procedure Act.