1. At the same time, the Defendant received KRW 150,000,000 from the Plaintiffs, and at the same time, made the buildings listed in the attached list to the Plaintiffs.

1. Basic facts

A. On August 27, 2006, Plaintiff A’s father D and the Defendant, on behalf of the Plaintiffs, concluded a lease agreement with regard to the term of lease on the 1st floor of 67.72 square meters and 49.09 square meters for 2nd floor, Jung-gu, Daegu Metropolitan City’s business office of reinforced concrete structure and 2nd floor of 2nd floor owned by the Plaintiffs (hereinafter “instant building”).

B. Around that time, the Defendant received delivery of the instant building, and operates a decentralization between “F” until now.

C. The instant lease agreement set the term of lease as of December 27, 2009 as of December 26, 201, and was renewed by setting the term of lease as of June 27, 201 as of June 26, 2012; and ③ the term of lease as of December 27, 2012 as of December 26, 201, respectively, by setting the term of lease as of December 26, 201, respectively, as of December 26, 2014.

The Defendant delayed the payment of KRW 9.4 million (excluding value-added tax, and prepaid on the 27th day of each month) from January 1, 2015 to March 3 of the same year, and the Plaintiffs, by content-certified mail, shall terminate the instant lease agreement on April 1, 2015, on the ground of the Defendant’s delinquency in the payment of the three-year rent.

The defendant received the above content-certified mail around that time.

E. On April 11, 2015, the Defendant paid the Plaintiff a total of KRW 31,020,000,000,000 in arrears and value-added tax, and paid the full amount equivalent to the rent by the date of closing the argument in the instant case.

F. D died on January 2015.

[Ground of recognition] Facts without dispute, Gap evidence Nos. 1 through 6, Eul evidence No. 2 (including paper numbers; hereinafter the same), the purport of the whole pleadings

2. The parties' assertion

A. The plaintiffs' assertion 1) At the time of entering into the instant lease agreement, D and the defendant representing the plaintiffs as to KRW 80 million, and the rent as KRW 3.5 million. However, the defendant paid KRW 10 million out of the above lease deposit and did not pay the remainder of KRW 70 million. 2) Thereafter, D and the defendant renewed the lease agreement.