beta
Text
A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than one year and six months.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
On May 25, 2012, the Defendant was sentenced to six months by the Cheongju District Court to imprisonment with labor for a violation of road traffic laws (unclaimed measures after an accident), and completed the execution of the sentence on September 25, 2012 in the Cheongju Prison.
[Criminal facts] 2017 Highest 2152
1. On December 2014, the criminal defendant against the victim C made a false statement to the victim C, “In the vicinity of Kimhae-si, the victim C made an exclusive supply contract for livestock products to D Et in the area south of the Republic of Korea, and the delivery of the first half of the first half of the first half of the first half of the first half of the second half of the first half of the second half of the second half of the second half of the second half of the year, and the principal shall be repaid by August 2016.”
However, the Defendant did not have entered into a livestock products monopoly supply contract as above. At the time, the Defendant paid the existing debt without any particular property, and was thought to use the money as an existing debt repayment, entertainment fund, etc., and there was no intention or ability to pay the borrowed money normally to the victim.
The Defendant: (a) by deceiving the victim as above; and (b) from January 23, 2015 to February 6, 2015, the victim was delivered KRW 90,000,000 as the above loan from the victim to February 6, 2015.
2. On July 25, 2015, the Defendant made a false statement to the victim E, who is an operator of “F” in the vicinity of Kimhae-si, and called “F” to the effect that “On the part of the customer, the customer would have received the payment from the customer if the credit was supplied.” On the other hand, the Defendant could make a lump sum payment by the 29th day of this month.”
However, the Defendant, without any particular property, repaid the existing debt with the “return prevention”, and disposed of it at a price lower than the delivery price even if it was supplied by the injured party.