logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울북부지방법원 2017.02.08 2016고단5499
사기등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

[Criminal’s History of Crime: Busan District Court’s decision on July 28, 2016: Imprisonment with prison labor for eight months and two years: the end of the suspension of execution on August 5, 2016; and the conclusion of the judgment on August 5, 2016 / [criminal facts] Notwithstanding that the Defendant is not a narcotics handler, the Defendant, as a result of influencesing the Defendant’s exemption from the number of ingredients of the stroke-m, which is a limited quantity of the stroke-m, which is a stroke-type mental medicine prescribed by the hospital due to influences, and attempted to purchase a large quantity of stroke-type exemption from the number of ingredients of the stroke-m (the name of the goods stroked; hereinafter “stroke-stroked”) by issuing

1. On February 16, 2012, the Defendant acquired pecuniary benefits equivalent to the amount of insurance benefits by having the victimized person pay KRW 6,486 from the National Health Insurance Corporation by having the injured person pay KRW 6,486 by taking medical treatment using his/her resident registration number when the Defendant was engaged in the above B as if he/she was the victim B. From around that time to April 1, 2015, the Defendant acquired pecuniary benefits equivalent to the total amount of KRW 521,271 from the injured person over 62 times in total, as shown in the list of crimes in the attached Table.

2. On February 16, 2012, the Defendant violated the Resident Registration Act issued the name and resident registration number of the “E pharmacy” in Daegu Northern-gu, Daegu-gu, as seen above, and subsequently, the Defendant issued a prescription issued as the name and the resident registration number of B, and subsequently, the Defendant purchased stroke 30 as if he were B, and requested the above pharmacy pharmacist to claim the Corporation to pay the amount of charges out of the amount of charges from the National Health Insurance Corporation based on the resident registration number B, and then, during the period from around December 31, 2014 to December 31, 2014, the Defendant denied the use of the resident registration number of B over 15 times in total, such as the statement No. 2, 3, 5, 6, 8, 11, 13, 16, 19, 222, 24, 26, 28, 30, and 49.

3. On February 16, 2012, the Defendant violated the Narcotics Control Act.

arrow