logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
Text
Reasons
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울남부지방법원 2018.07.19 2017가단232581 (1)
부당이득금
Text

1. The Defendant: 13,384,300 won to Plaintiff A and 5% per annum from July 21, 2017 to July 19, 2018; and

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. On October 12, 2015, Plaintiff A entered into an emigration arrangement contract with the Defendant, which is a corporation that engages in emigration arrangement business for the emigration of the Republic of Korea on July 27, 2016, under which Plaintiff A entered into an emigration arrangement contract (hereinafter “instant arrangement contract”).

Article 2 (Obligation of Defendant)

1. Selection and management of overseas good offices;

2. To carry out the various speeds and processes necessary for obtaining employment and approval for relocation in good faith under an agreement with the overseas good offices;

3. The defendant's obligations are terminated upon the acquisition of U.S. visa by the plaintiff.

Article 3 (Obligation of Plaintiff)

1. Preparation, preparation, and submission of basic and additional documents necessary for applying for entry permission related to employment visa holders;

(c) Payment of prescribed domestic employment expenses and permanent sovereignty agency fees by the designated deadline;

3. Before the issuance of a visa, the applicant must be faithful to his/her occupation, make decisions on the adjustment of property, suspension of studies, etc. and his/her liability shall be solely “Plaintiffs” and the Defendant must be informed “Defendants” of any change that may affect immigration.

B. The Defendant paid KRW 22,307,320 in total to October 12, 2015 to August 10, 2016, and Plaintiff B paid KRW 23,80,000 in total to the Defendant from July 28, 2016 to February 13, 2017.

(c) EE (E) systems among the immigration procedures of Canada countries are inevitably required by the labor market impact assessment report on foreigners of Canada countries (LMIA).

피고는 2016. 8. 10. 원고 A에 대한 LMIA를 받은 다음 같은 해 11. 17. EE 시스템을 통하여 원고 A의 이민 신청을 캐나다국에 접수하였으나, 같은 해 12. 1.경 ’원고 A이 과거 호주 퀸즈랜드에 거주한 이력이 있으므로 운전이력 서류를 제출하였어야 하는데 이를 누락하였으므로 이민 신청을 거절한다.‘는 취지의 회신을 받았다. 라.

In addition, the defendant.

arrow