logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 광주지방법원 2016.10.26 2016고정1595
재물손괴
Text

Punishment on the accused shall be determined by a fine of 300,000 won.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On July 13, 2016, the Defendant: (a) around 21:14, on the street in front of the Gwangju Mine-gu, and (b) on the ground that the victim C (the 69-year-old age) was obstructed by vehicle traffic by setting fire, etc. on the street, the Defendant destroyed the property equivalent to 30,000 won at the market price of the victim’s assertion because the victim’s c (the 69-year-old age) was involved in the car traffic.

The facts charged are stated as "the market price is equivalent to 50,000 won".

그런데 C이 작성한 진술서에는 “아이비 꽃 이삭 넝쿨(1개 시가 3만 원 상당)”, “화분값 2만 원 포함”이라고 기재되어 있을 뿐이고, 피해자가 주장하는 아이비 꽃 넝쿨 가격 3만 원에 화분 가격 2만 원이 포함되어 있는지 불분명하며, 그밖에 위 화분 및 아이비 꽃 넝쿨의 시가를 인정할 증거가 없다.

Since there is no obstacle to the defendant's right of defense, the value of the damaged property is modified and recognized as above.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. C’s statement;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to photographs of damaged articles;

1. Article 36 of the Criminal Act and Article 366 of the Criminal Act concerning the crime, the choice of fines;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the provisional payment order;

arrow