The prosecutor's appeal is dismissed.

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal (the period of eight months in rank, two years in suspended sentence, and forty hours in the number of compliance driving lectures) of the court below is deemed to be too uneasy and unfair.

2. The crime of this case is found to be serious for the defendant to escape without taking measures such as providing relief to the victim after the accident, because the defendant's direct operation without complying with the signal at a long distance and shocked the damaged vehicle according to the normal signals, and thus, the defendant's negligence is serious.

The victim suffered injury, such as brain-dead sugar, which requires medical treatment for about 30 days, and the damaged vehicle is damaged by the damage amounting to KRW 1,411,242.

However, it is true that the defendant has not committed a second offense against his depth.

In order to recover damage, the defendant paid KRW 1.1.3 million at the expense of the vehicle repair cost, part of the hospital, and agreed to pay KRW 5 million to the victim.

Until the court below, 2.5 million won was paid in this case, and 1 million won was paid in the trial court, and the victim wanted to take the action against the defendant.

In this case, there are circumstances in which the defendant should lose his workplace and support his wife and children.

In addition, considering the age, character and conduct, environment, etc. of the defendant and all the sentencing conditions shown in the pleadings, it cannot be said that the sentence imposed by the court below is too uneasible and unfair.

3. In conclusion, the prosecutor's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act as it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.