logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대전지방법원 2018.07.11 2018고단830
야간건조물침입절도등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The Defendant served in the “D” located in Daejeon Dong-gu, Daejeon, from October 2017, and was dismissed on January 15, 2018.

1. A thief: (a) around January 8, 2018, the Defendant: (b) opened a warehouse door in the “D” located in Daejeon East-gu Daejeon-gu, Daejeon-gu; (c) opened a storage door in any cresh using it; and (d) cut off with five high-tension electric wires remaining after using the market price of the victim E owned by the victim and kept there.

2. On January 9, 2018, the Defendant intruded into a warehouse at around 01:40 around 01:40, at the same place as paragraph (1) of this Article; and through an unlocked door door, for the purpose of cutting off high-tension electric wires; and subsequently, the Defendant took seven high-tension electric wires remaining after using the market price stored therein and using it in the market price of the victim’s possession.

2) On January 18, 2018, the Defendant opened and intruded the warehouse door using the key that was not returned after the dismissal from the company for the purpose of theft of high voltage wires at the same place as Paragraph 1 of the same Article, and used the two keys, and used five high voltage wires remaining after the market price stored therein was used in the victim’s possession.

3. The Defendant who attempted to larceny: (a) opened a driver’s seat of Franc vehicles parked in the same place as around 00:33 on January 18, 2018; and (b) taken off the Docctrine’s SD cards installed inside the driver’s seat of Franc vehicles parked therein;

Although we want to do so, the above SDR card did not go through the wind that does not go from the black stuff but did not go through an attempted attempt.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement of the police statement related to G;

1. Each statement of H and G;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes on field photographs, each CCTV video CD, damaged body pictures, and each investigation report;

1. Relevant provisions of the Criminal Act and Articles 329 (Aggravated Punishment, Selection of Imprisonment), 330 (a thief in case of intrusion on each night structure), 342, 329 (a thief in case of attempted larceny, and Selection of Imprisonment) of the Criminal Act concerning the relevant criminal facts and the selection of punishment;

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Code, Article 38 Section 1 of the Criminal Code, which increases concurrent crimes.

arrow