The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The decision of the court below on the gist of the grounds for appeal (ten months of imprisonment) is too unreasonable.

2. The circumstances favorable to the defendant include the fact that the defendant recognized his mistake and is against himself, recovered from damage to the crime of damage to property, and the victim does not want the punishment of the defendant.

On the other hand, the fact that the defendant has been punished several times due to the same crime, and the fact that the crime is not good, such as destroying another's property and avoiding the riot after inhaleing hallucinogenic substances, are disadvantageous to the defendant.

It is difficult to view that the lower court’s sentence is too unreasonable in light of the above circumstances and other conditions of sentencing indicated in the record, such as Defendant’s age, sex, environment, family relationship, motive for committing a crime, and circumstances after committing a crime.

Therefore, the defendant's above assertion is without merit.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the grounds that the defendant's appeal is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.