logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 청주지방법원 제천지원 2014.11.06 2014고단372
도로교통법위반(음주운전)
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On January 6, 2012, the Defendant was sentenced to one year of imprisonment for a crime of fraud at the Seoul Southern District Court (Seoul Southern District Court) and was released on August 14, 2012 during the execution of the sentence, and the remaining term of imprisonment has expired on October 7, 2012.

On May 16, 2014, at around 23:25, the Defendant driven C Lasta car at approximately 2 km from the roads before the East Sea Pool restaurant, which was in the Yacheon-si, to the front of the oil station in the same city, while under the influence of alcohol of 0.275% of blood alcohol level.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. A report on the current status of a drinking driver, a report on requests for appraisal, an appraisal report on blood alcohol, and a report on the personal identification of a drinking driver;

1. Previous convictions indicated in the judgment: Inquiries-written inquiries, criminal records, summary orders, etc., and the application of Acts and subordinate statutes concerning the number and accommodation of each individual;

1. Relevant Article of the Act on Criminal Facts, Articles 148-2 (2) 1 and 44 (1) of the Road Traffic Act, the choice of punishment, and the choice of imprisonment;

1. The reason for sentencing under Articles 53 and 55(1)3 of the Criminal Act for discretionary mitigation has a record of being punished three times due to drunk driving, etc., and one of them has a record of having been sentenced one time. However, the Defendant, who committed the crime of this case during the period of repeated crime due to fraud, should be subject to strict punishment.

Therefore, the defendant is sentenced to punishment.

However, since 2006, there is no record of punishment for drinking driving, and other sentencing conditions such as the family relationship of the defendant shall be determined within the scope of punishment as ordered once by taking into account the various sentencing conditions such as the defendant's family relation.

arrow