Defendant

A Imprisonment with prison labor for seven years, for four years, for four years, and for one year, for Defendant C, respectively.

Defendant

A. A.

Punishment of the crime

On May 25, 2012, Defendant A, including the criminal records of “2017 High 178”, was sentenced to three years of imprisonment for a violation of the Narcotics Control Act at the Jung-gu District Court on May 25, 2012, and the execution of the sentence was terminated on January 28, 2015. On October 28, 2016, Defendant A was sentenced to two years of imprisonment for a violation of the Narcotics Control Act at the Daegu District Court and became final and conclusive on November 5, 2016.

Defendant

B on September 24, 2012, the Seoul High Court sentenced two years to imprisonment for a violation of the Punishment of Violences, etc. Act (the composition activities of organizations, etc.), and on January 9, 2013, the Incheon District Court sentenced one year and two months to a violation of the Narcotics Control Act (a violation of the Act) at the Incheon District Court on February 5, 2015, and completed the enforcement of the sentence on February 5, 2015. On May 11, 2017, the Incheon District Court sentenced to one year and six months of imprisonment for a violation of the Act on the Control of Narcotics, Etc. at the Incheon District Court, and the judgment became final and conclusive on July 7, 2017.

Defendant

C On April 8, 2015, the Jeonju District Court was sentenced to imprisonment for ten months for a violation of the Act on the Control of Narcotics, Etc. in the military support of the Military Demarcation District Court, and the judgment became final and conclusive on May 12, 2016.

Defendants are not narcotics handlers.

Criminal facts

1. Defendant A and Defendant B’s joint crime (a violation of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes) committed by Defendant A and Defendant B (a violation of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes) expressed that Defendant A, using international peculiar transmission cargo from F in China, intended to keep the phone by means of delivery of approximately 100 g of Mesofts (i.e., a philophone; hereinafter “philophones”), and asked Defendant B, who was engaged in the transaction of flat philophones, to explain the plan and request the performance of the role of receiving the international unique transmission cargo, and Defendant B accepted the proposal for the purpose of gaining profits by covering part of the Mesolophones in the future.

After that, on February 22, 2016, Defendant A remitted KRW 8.5 million to the account used by F, etc., and F divided approximately 100g of philopon into 100 in the color plastic paper with 100g of philopon from the non-commercial paper in China.