logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울서부지방법원 2015.09.25 2015노593
폭행
Text

The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

Reasons

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal is that at the time of the instant case, the victim left his body in order to ppuri the back timber and shoulder of the Defendant, and the victim was blicked by blicking the blick belt of the Defendant, and the victim did not go beyond the stairs by pushing the victim.

Even if the defendant was informed of the victim, it constitutes a legitimate act due to a mere defense against the victim's assault.

2. According to the following circumstances acknowledged by the evidence duly admitted and examined by the court below, the defendant can recognize the facts constituting the crime as stated in the judgment below and the victim's assault in both hands, and it is also difficult to view it as a legitimate act.

Therefore, the defendant's above assertion is not accepted.

① At an investigative agency and the lower court, the victim stated relatively consistent and specifically in the following purport: “At the time of the instant case, the Defendant sought to enter and depart from the victim’s house, and the Defendant expressed her desire and her drinking to the victim, but did not keep the victim from drinking. After all, the Defendant was pushed the victim into the stairs by hand.”

Although the victim made a statement in an investigative agency that he was tight stairs to the defendant, the court below stated that he did not put a bicycle on the stairs in the bid or the court below did not go beyond it, the statement itself does not reverse the facts that the defendant was pushed the victim, and the facts charged that "the victim was deprived of the stairs" was deleted by the changes in the indictment, and it does not constitute a crime in the judgment of the court below.

② In light of the fact that: (a) the Defendant met the wife of the victim who was in an internal relationship at the time of the instant case; (b) there was a vagabonds with each other; and (c) the Defendant stated that the victim was dead even during that process, etc., at the time of the instant case.

arrow