logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 인천지방법원 2013.09.12 2013고단2521
게임산업진흥에관한법률위반
Text

Defendant

A Imprisonment with prison labor for one year, for defendant B and C, for six months.

but for three years from the date this judgment becomes final.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

Defendant

A around November 2009, H and Dong will take charge of the recruitment of member stores of the game product "Mamar and Paman 2", and I will take charge of the supply and exchange of the game product in question by supplying "heat" to a member store and operating a money exchange site in exchange for points obtained through the use of the game product in question. Defendant C instructed the above I to recruit member stores and decided to recruit member stores under the direction of Defendant B, and Defendant B decided to recruit member stores.

The aforementioned “competing game” game is an online game classified by the Game Rating Board as “not permitted for use by juveniles.” The game was determined by the user’s personal ability, such as net power, where the result of the game was charactered in line with the progress of the game, and the game was operated online by the main and the user, which requires cooperation among the users. However, the above “competing” game provided by the Defendant, etc., which was provided for use by the Defendant, was automatically carried out even though the game was not operated by the user, and the result was determined by a flexible method regardless of the user’s ability, such as omitting some sections necessary for cooperation among the users, and it was determined that the game was carried out only within the franchise store through the local server established in each member shop without going through the main and the game was remodeled so that the chain of success of the franchise operator can be adjusted.

The Defendants knew that such game products were opened and altered, and knew that I would exchange according to the scores obtained by customers.

Defendant

A From December 2009 to June 201, 2010, Defendant B and Franchisive domestic member stores through the solicitation of Defendant B and Franchisive domestic member stores.

arrow