The appeal is dismissed.

The grounds of appeal are examined.

The judgment below

Examining the evidence duly admitted by the first instance court, the court below’s determination that the facts charged in this case were guilty and rejected the Defendant’s assertion of self-defense based on its reasoning and circumstances as stated in its holding is acceptable.

In so determining, the court below did not err by misapprehending the legal principles on the grounds for the exclusion of illegality or the grounds for the exclusion of responsibility, contrary to the allegations in the grounds of appeal.

In addition, pursuant to Article 383 subparagraph 4 of the Criminal Procedure Act, only in cases where death penalty, life imprisonment, or imprisonment or imprisonment without prison labor for more than ten years has been imposed, an appeal on the grounds of unfair sentencing is allowed, and thus, in this case where a fine is imposed against the defendant, the argument that the amount of the

Therefore, the appeal is dismissed. It is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all participating Justices on the bench.