beta
Text
1. Defendant B Co., Ltd. shall pay to the Plaintiff KRW 124,977,644 as well as the annual interest rate from February 10, 2013 to the date of full payment.
Reasons
1. Claim against Defendant B
A. Basic facts 1) Defendant B Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “Defendant Company”).
(1) Around 2005, the Plaintiff (hereinafter “instant No. 1”) is the Plaintiff’s heading 111 and 112 (hereinafter “instant building”).
(2) On July 29, 2005, upon request of the Plaintiff, the Plaintiff completed the registration of ownership transfer with respect to the building No. 1 of this case on July 27, 2005. In addition, the Defendant Company borrowed the Plaintiff’s name in order to obtain a loan from the South Changwon Agricultural Cooperative (hereinafter “Seoul Agricultural Cooperative”) as security for the building No. 1 of this case to the Plaintiff. On July 28, 2005, the Defendant Company had the Plaintiff complete the registration of ownership transfer with respect to the building No. 1 of this case on July 28, 2005, the Plaintiff completed the registration of ownership transfer with respect to the Plaintiff, 1.3 billion won (the maximum debt amount, 1,690,000) from the Plaintiff, the obligor, the obligor, through the interest rate on July 29, 2005, 1.3 billion won (the debt interest rate, 200 million won, 1.3 billion won (hereinafter “the loan interest rate of this case”).
3) However, the Defendant Company did not repay the instant loan and interest even after the due date for the instant loan was expired; on May 26, 201, the Nam Changwon Agricultural Co., Ltd applied for voluntary auction against the instant building No. 1 on October 26, 201, and November 13, 2012, in which part of the interest and principal of the instant loan were paid, but the remainder of the principal was not paid, but was not paid. 【Ground for recognition’s ground for recognition’s absence of dispute; 【No. 2, 3, 4, 8, 9 (including the serial number; hereinafter the same shall apply).
each entry, the purport of the whole pleading
B. In full view of the purport of the entire pleadings in the statement No. 1, No. 9 of the judgment, Defendant Company was responsible for all interest, etc. on the instant loan to the Plaintiff around July 29, 2005, by deceiving the Plaintiff by lending his name, and by deceiving the Plaintiff on July 29, 2005.