1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

1. The Plaintiff’s assertion is the cause of the instant claim, and the Plaintiff and the Defendant entered into a contract for the total number of student uniforms B (C total number) on August 7, 2015. The Defendant alleged that B made D into a new brand of D Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “D”) investing 12 billion won in the project explanation meeting, etc. but was all false although it was made in the project explanation meeting, etc., the Defendant claimed an excessive amount of the labeling price for the student uniforms prior to the total printing contract, the Belgium price for the student uniforms, Brro (Advertisements book), and the sampling price, and the sample price, etc.; the Plaintiff promised to promise the above total sales contract to cancel or cancel, and that it did not comply with the contract on the ground of change of the circumstances or deception, and that the Plaintiff’s total sales board production cost of KRW 1,540,000,000,000,000 won, 300,508 won, 300,508 won and 808 won.

2. In full view of each description of Gap evidence Nos. 1 through 29 (including paper numbers) and witness G’s testimony alone, it is insufficient to acknowledge it otherwise, and there is no other evidence to acknowledge it. Moreover, in full view of the overall purport of the arguments Nos. 1 through 22 (including paper numbers), the defendant continues to maintain a supply relationship between the defendant and Eul, and the defendant has made efforts for smooth consultation on matters related to mathing and production as alleged by the plaintiff through a business briefing session, a total board opening ceremony, and a general board board meeting, etc. on several occasions from July 2015 to December 2015.