A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

except that the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

(e).

Punishment of the crime

On April 30, 2014, at around 22:20, the Defendant assaulted a police officer, including, but not limited to, 18 Sinsan Sinsan Sinsib, following the 112 report process, D, a police officer belonging to the Sinsan Police Station C police box, called 112 report, “I will get off her clothes. I will get off her clothes. I will get off her clothes. I will get off her clothes. I will get off her uniforms. I will get off her clothes. I will get off her clothes. I will get off her clothes. I will get off her clothes. I will get off her clothes. I will get off she will get off her clothes. I will get off she will get off her clothes.” On the same day, I will get off she will get off her clothes. I will get off she will get off her clothes.”

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Application of each police protocol of statement to D, G, and F

1. Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the crime concerned;

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act of the Commercial Concurrent Crimes;

1. Selection of imprisonment with prison labor chosen;

1. Rejection of public prosecution under Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act (including the fact that there is no past record of the same kind of crime and no record of the crime subject to a heavier punishment than a fine, and that there appears to repent, etc.);

1. On April 30, 2014, the Defendant: (a) committed assault against the victim G, who was in the vicinity of the victim G, with his/her own desire to her own; and (b) committed assault against him/her at one time by taking the victim’s hand at the victim G, who was in the vicinity of the cross-city bus terminal.

2. The judgment is a crime falling under Article 260(1) of the Criminal Act and cannot be prosecuted against the victim’s express intent under Article 260(3) of the Criminal Act. The victim wishes to punish the defendant around May 26, 2014, which was the date of the prosecution of this case.