logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울행정법원 2018.06.21 2016구단11608
휴업급여감액및장해등급처분결정취소
Text

1. On February 19, 2016, the Defendant rendered part of the site price of temporary layoff benefits against the Plaintiff on February 19, 2016, from October 1, 2014 to November 4, 2015.

Reasons

1. Details of the disposition;

A. On April 5, 2012, the Plaintiff became a member of the electric utility company B and served as an electric utility. On June 11, 2012, at around 09:00, the Plaintiff was subject to an accident where electric wires pipe was put to the air pipe, and the Plaintiff was suffering from an unreshed material, and the Plaintiff was discharged from the air pipe. (hereinafter “instant accident”).

B. Thereafter, the Plaintiff obtained medical treatment from the Defendant for the escape certificate of the conical signboard between the Defendant, No. 3-4 (hereinafter “instant approved injury and disease”). On June 12, 2013, the Plaintiff received medical treatment from several medical institutions. “Invertebrate extend (Pebin 3-4)” in the C Hospital on June 12, 2013.

C. On December 18, 2015, the Plaintiff filed a claim for temporary layoff benefits from June 12, 2012 to November 4, 2015, with the Defendant. On February 19, 2016, the Defendant rendered a claim for temporary layoff benefits from February 19, 2016, on the ground that “it is deemed impossible to provide employment treatment because stable medical treatment is required until September 30, 2014, but it is determined that employment treatment is possible from October 1, 2014, which is ordinarily recognized for approved injury and disease, after the full recovery period.” The temporary layoff benefits from June 12, 2012 to September 30, 2014, from October 1, 2014 to November 4, 2015, the Defendant disposed of temporary layoff benefits from October 1, 2014 to October 4, 2015, excluding the remainder of the temporary layoff benefits from October 10 to 24, 2015 (hereinafter “the remainder of the site”).

Meanwhile, on April 12, 2016, the Plaintiff filed a claim for disability benefits with the Defendant. On April 22, 2016, the Defendant determined on April 22, 2016, that the new disability grade due to the Plaintiff’s instant injury and disease constituted “Class 11 subparag. 7,” and that the Plaintiff had previously undergone “vertebrate dystrophical surgery (e.g., 4-5, g., g., g., g., e., e., e., e., e., e., e., e.

arrow