beta
Text
The accused shall dismiss an application for remedy by the applicant for remedy of innocence.
Reasons
1. On May 10, 2012, the Defendant was sentenced to imprisonment with prison labor for a crime of fraud at the Seoul Central District Court on May 10, 2012, and the judgment was finalized on the 18th of the same month.
[ all facts] The defendant was issued seven arrest warrants across the country on Jan. 22, 2009 on suspicion of fraud, such as arrest warrant (the warrant request number 2008-752) (the warrant request number 2008-752) around 2007 and arrest warrant (the warrant request number 2007-167) (the warrant request number 2007-167). On Nov. 22, 2008, the defendant was arrested in the detention room of the Yongsan-gu Seoul Central District Public Prosecutor's Office 2009, the defendant was arrested in the detention room of Busan District Public Prosecutor's Office 1338, Dong-gu, Busan District Public Prosecutor's Office 2009. The defendant was arrested in the above suspicion, etc., by requesting the defendant's victim, who was a civilian military employee in the military service, who was aware of inside the house, and requested the creditors to arrest the defendant's condition.
[Criminal facts]
1. The Defendant, who committed the crime of December 19, 2008, was arrested on or around December 19, 2008 as above, and was confined to the above arrest warrant (number 2008-752) pursuant to the above arrest warrant (number 2008-752), and was detained in the detention room of the Daejeon East-gu Daejeon Police Station, Daejeon-gu, Daejeon-gu, Daejeon-gu, with the face of 670, at the interview room of the above police station, the victim D and G have the amount of KRW 40 million to E.
‘40 million won will be fully paid until January 30, 2009.
“A request is made instead of a loan certificate. On the other hand, a detention room will be held in the amount of KRW 40 million.
“.......”
However, the defendant did not have the intent or ability to pay the victims or E even if the victims have given E a certificate of loan in the name of guarantee for the defendant.
As above, the defendant deceiving the victims, and let them prepare a certificate of loan in the name of debt guarantee worth KRW 40 million E and 40 million on the same day, and the victims receive a claim for payment order worth KRW 40 million (Seoul Central District Court Decision 2010Da51450) from E.